Friday 2 October 2009

SaaS as a software protection strategy

02 October 2009

Source: http://www.extranetevolution.com/extranet_evolution/

Reading WorldCAD Access and The CAD Industry blogs this morning, I learned about the latest developments in a court case brought by Autodesk to stop an eBay trader, Tim Vernor, from selling second-hand CAD software. Ignoring the complex issues relating to copyright, it occurred to me that other software vendors are already side-stepping such issues by delivering their software as a service.

Instead of distributing disks or enabling software downloads to users' local machines, hosting the application 'in the cloud' and allowing users to access the solution and its related data via the internet effectively prevents any end-user from gaining access to the underlying software code. This wasn't a vendor benefit that I had previously identified as inherent to the SaaS model, but alongside the other advantages of SaaS - faster development and testing, easier deployment, quicker upgrades or patching, economies of scale, more efficient support, etc - perhaps protection of the vendor's intellectual property should also be another reason to embrace the SaaS approach.

Tuesday 1 September 2009

The elusive mobile business model

Sep 1, 2009

Experts have identified numerous business models that could work for different segments of the mobile industry. However, too many people still find ways to get it wrong, writes Christopher Backeberg...
Businessweek mobile business model


"If only there were an app that showed media companies how to make money on the iPhone," reads the start of a recent article in the New York Times. "They know they need to have an app for the iPhone, so they create appealing ones loaded with features. Yet it is far from clear how much revenue media apps for the iPhone can produce."

It's difficult to discern a practical business plan, or even any plan at all, behind most of the tens of thousands of apps available from the Apple App Store. As the New York Times notes, developers are trying to devise business models by trial and error. Should they use subscription models or advertising models? Does the app appear likely to generate a continuing revenue stream or is it better suited to a one-time payment model?

It could even be better not to look for any significant revenue from some of the winning apps. Some major media companies treat their apps as promotional tools rather than money-spinners, using them primarily to gain exposure for their brand.

How does one select an appropriate business model (BM), and not just for apps but for any potentially profitable mobile undertaking? It's not a bad idea to begin by dispelling some false notions about mobile marketing.

Myths and misconceptions

iLoop Mobile has summarised some of the mistaken beliefs about strategies and tactics that could be applied to leverage the mobile channel:

* The mobile channel is not effective for marketing: False; the mobile phone has become a significant channel for communications and content
* Mobile is exclusively a youth marketing channel: False; the average age of people who use text messaging is over 30, and increasing numbers of older people are making use of the other benefits that mobile offers
* Mobile marketing is intrusive and unwanted: False; mobile operator regulations and industry best practices are steadily winning ground for opt-in marketing that users actually welcome.
* You need an opt-in database for mobile: False; opt-in experiential marketing and brand interactivity lead to a win-win situation for consumers and brands
* Mobile marketing exploits cutting-edge, sexy technology: False; it's about applying sensible strategies and tactics. It's human, not mechanical. As iLoop says about gimmicky technology: "Just because you can do it doesn't mean you should do it."

How to get it wrong

BMs have to be thought out meticulously from conception to post-launch follow-up. Of course it helps if the BM is being applied to a sensible product.

"Judge not lest ye be judged." OK, we'll step aside and let others pass judgement on some ventures that may defy all attempts to monetise them!

Steven Walling at ReadWrite Enterprise was unimpressed by TwoTweet, a shopping cart service closely integrated with Twitter. It lets customers "reply to buy."

Walling wrote: "Relying on the unstable and insecure platform that is Twitter may be the dumbest business decision you ever make. You can only sell one item at a time with the system. But even for very small businesses, this is a dangerous venture. Allowing access to an ecommerce environment with your social network as an identity provider is a supremely bad idea."

And Daily Technology News was profoundly unmoved by VisionQuest Carfinder, a $20 app that will find your car in a parking lot... but it needs a combination of Blackberry and an in-car Bluetooth device that automatically feeds the GPS coordinates of your car's location into your Blackberry. The writer commented: "I can mark my car's position with all manner of GPS apps," including free ones.

Twelve paths to monetisation

If you do have a product worth selling there are many ways to market it. A few years ago Helen Keegan, MD and founder of UK mobile marketing agency BeepMarketing, identified 12 workable BMs for the mobile industry. These models are still fully valid.

1. Ad funded content: offer extra air time, free ring tones, games or some other incentive in exchange for the customer agreeing to accept mobile advertising
2. Mobile advertising: Site owners who use the services of agencies such as AdMob can make money by offering pay-per-click advertising from their sites without having to find advertisers themselves
3. Sponsored SMS: Offer ad space below the directory enquiries text messages at a low cost per thousand. Keegan noted that this isn't highly effective because there is no obvious targeting
4. Sell your list: Selling your database to any willing buyer is a mucky business. Keegan said: "There are lots of data protection hoops to jump through - and rightly so. If you've structured your terms and conditions properly you'll have permission to send messages on behalf of third parties, but that the data can't leave your hands"
5. Branded content: Tying in a trusted brand may seem to imply greater sales potential but this doesn't automatically follow. Some content creators pay a burdensome licensing fee or sign away revenue for the privilege of using the brand name, and the brand owner may not add any marketing support
6. Sponsored content: Find a big brand sponsor to fund your app, or whatever, and you may get to ride on the sponsor's marketing
7. Off-the-page promotion: A revenue share deal in which the content company pays the publisher for each customer acquired
8. Subscription model: Offer a service for a fixed regular fee. "If you get it right, it's a very profitable way to monetise your business," Keegan commented
9. Wholesale: Syndication of your content or product to a network operator, media owner, content aggregator or app store. Be aware that the extended value chain reduces your profits
10. Retail: Going direct to consumer (d2c) requires building your brand and trust. You're responsible for the marketing and distribution
11. Don't have a business model: Huh? Well, there are successful Internet businesses that didn't have a BM when they started, and it could also happen in mobile - but Keegan warns that the successes will be few and the failures will be many

It doesn't end there. For even more, Stephen N. Ulanoski, former senior VP and GM - Telematics Solutions, GE Capital, will include the “data as a service” business model in his presentation at MetaPlaces09.

That's a sampling of BMs for the industry in general. What of the options for specific segments?

Making money from apps

Del Daix wrote in the San Jose Media Industry Examiner: "First, choose a mobile application development platform. Don't get yourself locked down.

"What type of mobile app? Games are always on top of the list of apps people are downloading, followed closely by professional tools and helpful local tools."

Daix has some sage advice about going where the current market is thronging: "Write an app Apple will like, a way of using their phone nobody thought of before."

According to Daix the most difficult step in any marketing plan is creating awareness of your offering. She says: "Aim to get your app featured at the top of the list in the app store. A featured app is guaranteed a tenfold increase in download rate." Of course this may be much easier said than done.

One of the most critical steps in the BM is deciding on a price for your product - or if you should even charge for it! According to Daix, the most common approach evident in the Apple App Store is "free app today, let's see tomorrow." When the app starts taking off, you may start charging users for premium services or a subscription. For games, with their shorter lifetime, an upfront payment is more common.

Four models for operators

An Advertisement-based Platform Business Model for Mobile Operators is a serious academic paper but it is not overly technical and may be well worth downloading. Its authors describe four BMs for networks, including one that hasn't seriously started yet.

* Telco-centric model: As followed by the Vodafone Live! platform. "It places the majority of roles within a real-life stakeholder, the telecom carrier, which acts as portal provider, service aggregator, network operator and platform operator"
* Device-centric model: For example, the iPhone. The main service platform is incorporated in or tied together with the mobile device
* Aggregator-centric model: Favoured by Facebook Mobile. This BM expands on the concept of using a service portal to disclose services - the service aggregator takes over the role of portal provider, independently of the mobile network operator
* Service-centric model: This is still largely a theoretical model for now, based partly on plans and models surrounding Google's Open Social initiative in offering APIs for social networking applications

Morgan Gillis, executive director, LiMo, will be speaking at MetaPlaces09 on the best models to provide operator-centric services.

Monetising a mobile site

Briefly, mobiForge suggests there are two primary ways that Internet advertising can help with a mobile web site:

* Driving traffic to your site with paid-for ads or keywords on other sites and search engines
* Embedding ads on your own site to monetise traffic from your own users

mobiForge adds that AdMob, the biggie of mobile advertising, follows the second of these two routes by using a revenue model based on cost-per-click.

To sum up...

According to Rebecca Wettemann, VP at Nucleus Research, a compelling BM for mobile technology relies on identifying the key benefits of the product or service, then deploying it to ensure maximum returns.

Wettemann elaborates: "Instead of a lengthy laundry list of 20 to 30 benefits, focus on the two or three most important gains you hope to achieve. These include increased productivity, reduction in administrative or communication costs, and improved efficiencies."

She adds that you need to assess the project by "breadth" (how many people will be helped by the application) and "repeatability" (frequency of application use). This approach is aimed at maximising the benefits, not minimising your costs.

Business models and mobile marketing topics will come under scrutiny at MetaPlaces09.

* Login or register to post comments

Thursday 16 July 2009

The 6th International Conference on Innovation in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC)

The AE Department will host the 6th International Conference on Innovation in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) from June 9-11, 2010, as part of the activities to mark 100 years of architectural engineering at Penn State. Organized in collaboration with the Centre for Innovative and Collaborative Engineering at Loughborough University, UK, the conference will provide an excellent international forum for celebrating innovative research and industry developments in AEC.

It is intended that Thursday, June 10, 2010, will focus on industry-related topics and issues. It will feature industry-oriented presentations and discussion panels, and industry practitioners will be particularly welcome.

State College, Pennsylvania: June 9-11, 2010

More info: http://www.engr.psu.edu/ae/AEC2010/index.asp

Wednesday 29 April 2009

Techworld.com - Microsoft to offer voice command with mobiles

Techworld.com - Microsoft to offer voice command with mobiles

New version of Windows Mobile to feature Tellme technology

Nancy Gohring, IDG news service
29 April 2009

Microsoft is set to introduce a speech-recognition application for the forthcoming Windows Mobile upgrade. The company plans to announce a new service that will work on Windows Mobile 6.5 devices and will let people speak into the phone to search the Internet, make phone calls and dictate text messages.

The technology comes from Tellme, a company acquired by Microsoft in 2007. Key to the offering is a dedicated button that launches the service on the phone, said Marcello Typrin, director of product management for Tellme. To make it really easy to use, the service should be accessible from a single point, he said. That compares to the iPhone experience, where users must navigate to the apps page and open the Google Mobile App to use a similar voice-activated search service.

In addition, the Tellme application is about more than just search. Windows Mobile 6.5 users will be able to say "call" and a name, and the phone will automatically dial a name from the address book. Users can also say "text," and then dictate a message that will be converted to text and then sent.

Otherwise, if users just start speaking, the technology will automatically search for the words.

The Tellme service will automatically be set to use Microsoft's Live Search, but people will be able to change it to use another search provider if they want to, Typrin said. "We don't want to force someone onto a search engine they don't want to use," he said.

Windows Mobile customers can already use voice commands with Live Search, but the Tellme application adds the text and voice call features and pulls all three into a single, easily accessible service.

While customers may need to push fewer buttons to launch the service, they have to push buttons more often while using the service than do their iPhone-using counterparts. With the Tellme text application, for example, users hit the button before they start speaking their message and hit it again when they're done speaking. By contrast, the Google Mobile App automatically starts listening when the user moves the phone to the ear and then stops when the user is finished speaking.

The offering will come free with Windows Mobile 6.5, the next generation of the operating system that is scheduled to start appearing on phones in the second half of the year, but it's up to the phone maker to include it. Microsoft doesn't intend to make the service exclusive to Windows Mobile phones, so other platforms may start using it in the future, Typrin said.

The application will also become available in Microsoft's forthcoming mobile application marketplace, so people who buy Windows Mobile 6.5 phones that don't come pre-loaded with the capability will be able to download it later. If they do, they'll follow instructions to assign the Tellme function to a specific button on the phone. They could, for example, set up the service so that pressing and holding the Windows button that comes on most Windows Mobile phones will activate the service..

This article was printed from Techworld : www.techworld.com
The UK's infrastructure & network knowledge centre
© 2009 : All rights reserved

Monday 2 March 2009

CSI - Context Sensitive Intelligence

CSI - Context Sensitive Intelligence

Context Sensitive Intelligence

Software-Development for Adaptation

Project Goals

In the CSI project we research towards an infrastructure for context-driven software adaptation. Our two foci are: support developers in building adaptive software, support end-users with intelligent self-adaptive software.

Organisation

CSI is funded by the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories.
The project started in autumn 2004 and runs until autumn 2007.

Motivation

In a world which is more and more provided with pervasive computing, end-users of mobile devices face an increasing complexity in using available, computer-assisted services in many different contexts. The users' mobile devices have to be adaptive to changing situations and requirements in a preferably automatic and user-friendly way. The developer needs a highly-flexible framework which enables users to make use of basic functionalities and provides service-providers with an easily extensible architecture to facilitate the development of new services.

Research Questions

  • How should we model context?
  • What kind of software adaptations are required?
  • How should context changes be mapped to software adaptation needs?
  • Which software technologies serve the demands for implementing adaptability most appropriately?

Publications

  • M. Appeltauer, R. Hirschfeld, T. Rho: Dedicated Programming Support for Context-aware Ubiquitous Application UBICOMM 2008: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, vol. , IEEE Computer Society Press, Valencia, Spain, 2008
  • H. Mügge, P. Bihler, M. Schmatz, A.B. Cremers: Context and Situation as Enablers for Multi-Modal Interaction in Mobile Games. HCI 2008 Workshop: Evaluating Player Experiences in Location Aware Games, Liverpool, 2008 [pdf]
  • H. Mügge, K.-H. Lüke and M. Eisemann: Potentials and Requirements of Mobile Ubiquitous Computing for Public Transport. In Proceedings of the UbiLog Workshop at Informatik 2007, Bremen, 2007 [pdf]
  • P. Bihler and H. Mügge: Supporting Cross-Application Contexts with Dynamic User Interface Fusion. In Proceedings of the MoBe Workshop at Informatik 2007, Bremen, 2007 [pdf]
  • P. Bihler, F. Schulz, H. Mügge: SmartDiscuss - Moderation Tool-Support for Face-to-Face Discussions. Poster at the 10th European Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work (ECSCW'07), Limerick, Ireland, 2007 [abstract as pdf]
  • J. Kuck and M. Gnasa: Context-Sensitive Service Discovery meets Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2007), White Plains, NY, USA, 2007
  • J. Kuck and F. Reichartz: A collaborative and featurebased approach to ContextSensitive Service Discovery WWW Conference 2007,Workshop: MobEA V- Mobile Web in the developing world
  • H. Mügge, T. Rho and A.B. Cremers: Integrating Aspect-Orientation and Structural Annotations to Support Adaptive Middleware. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Middleware-Application Interaction at EuroSys Conference, Lisbon, 2007 [pdf]
  • H. Mügge, T. Rho, D. Speicher, P. Bihler, A.B. Cremers: Programming for Context-based Adaptability – Lessons learned about OOP, SOA, and AOP, Workshop Selbstorganisierende, Adaptive, Kontextsensitive verteilte Systeme, Bern, 2007 [pdf]
  • P. Bihler, G. Kniesel: Seamless Cross-Application Workflow Support by User Interface Fusion. Workshop on Multiple and Ubiquitous Interaction Aarhus, Denmark, 28-30 March 2007 [pdf]
  • T. Rho, M. Schmatz, A.B. Cremers: Towards Context-Sensitive Service Aspects. European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming 2006. Workshop on Object Technology for Ambient Intelligence , Nantes [pdf]
  • H. Mügge, T. Rho, D. Speicher, J. Kuck, A.B. Cremers: Towards an Infrastructure for Context-Sensitive Intelligence. Workshop Selbstorganisierende, Adaptive, Kontextsensitive verteilte Systeme, Kassel, 2006 [pdf]
  • Mügge H., Rho T., Winandy M., Won M., Cremers A.B., Costanza P., Englert R.: Towards Context-Sensitive Intelligence, In: R. Morrison and F. Oquendo (Eds.): EWSA 2005, LNCS 3527, pp. 231–238, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005 [pdf]

Further Information

You are welcome to ask for details. Please contact Holger Mügge.

Thursday 26 February 2009

What is Interaction-Design.org?

Interaction-Design.org

This website is all about making research accessible. We deal mainly with the human-centered aspects of IT product development: Interaction Design, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Design, Human Factors, Usability, Information Architecture, and related fields.

We make research accessible through our 4 sections:

This website is all about making research accessible. We deal mainly with the human-centered aspects of IT product development: Interaction Design, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Design, Human Factors, Usability, Information Architecture, and related fields.
  1. a free, open-content, peer-reviewed Encyclopedia interlinked with our bibliography
  2. a comprehensive, editable (but peer-reviewed) bibliography which includes the most authoritative publications in the above-mentioned disciplines
  3. a conference calendar, which is used on several other websites through our ICAL interface.
  4. "misDesigns" - a new rhetorical vehicle, which ties research themes to short, simple, and funny examples of defective designs.

We believe in Open Content and use the Creative Commons Copyright Licences, which makes the content of this website in effect the property of our community, not of this specific website.

Thursday 22 January 2009

Hybrid positioning technologies are getting traction

Hybrid positioning technologies are getting traction

Hybrid positioning technologies are getting traction



Hybrid positioning technologies are getting traction
Many new LBS applications such as social networking, local search, pedestrian and mass transit navigation or geo-tagging are expected to be used in places such as indoor or urban canyons where GPS takes forever to have a fix - or never does. Therefore, alternative and hybrid positioning technologies such as Wi-Fi and Cell-ID will become increasingly important to offer a smooth experience to consumers.

“Users expect a seamless and transparent location experience regardless of application or environment,” says ABI Research director Dominique Bonte. “Since no single positioning technology can provide this, the future will be about hybrid positioning systems, combining A-GPS, Cell-ID, Wi-Fi, cellular, motion sensors, and even TV broadcast and proximity technologies such as Bluetooth, NFC and RFID. A-GPS, Wi-Fi and Cell-ID will be the winning combination offering accuracy, availability, interoperability and short fix times at low cost. It will represent 25% of all positioning solutions by 2014. Stand-alone Cell-ID and/or Wi-Fi will remain important in regions with low GPS handset penetration.“

Step by step this market is taking shape. Two announcements made last week are demonstrating it.
First, Skyhook Wireless, the leader in the Wi-Fi positioning space (the Boston-based company powers the iPhone), has upgraded its SDK to include Android support, as well as hybrid positioning (GPS+Cell-ID+Wi-Fi) which offers a comprehensive solution to software developers willing to add location to their mobile applications.

Hybrid positioning technologies are getting traction
Second, the German software and service provider Spotigo announced that its WiFi-based Positioning Solution (“WiPS”) is now available in more than 25 countries. “The most important cities in countries like the United States, Germany, UK, Spain, France, Russia, India, Korea, etc. are covered significantly already”, said Spotigo in a statement. “We are looking forward to being able to provide a world-wide service within the next few months,” said Daniel Prümers, CEO of Spotigo.

Navizon’s community

In addition to these public announcements, New-York City-based Navizon has been harnessing the power of its community which nowadays counts over 800,000 members. Indeed, while Skyhook Wireless relies on a fleet of paid drivers that build a Wi-Fi map database, Navizon relies on its members who automatically report and update new Wi-Fi hotspots around the world. Moreover, some of these users are getting money in doing that, because Navizon choosed to reward its most active users. As a result, Navzon has built a decent Wi-Fi and cell-ID data map for cities in emerging or developing markets such as Moscow, St Petersburg, San Paolo, Istanbul, Bangalore or Johannesburg. It might take months - if not years - to Skyhook to get there. But the Boston-based company has the advantage to set its database mapping priority on its own and to have a tighter control over the data.


Hybrid positioning technologies are getting traction
Google and Microsoft
Google has been building its own reference databases of cell-tower and/or Wi-Fi hotspot locations (called MyLocation) via user-generated content and/or self-learning mechanisms, and is offering it for free to developers. However, Google does not offer any service level agreement, does not disclose its coverage and has loose privacy rules. Microsoft is also starting to show interest in hybrid positioning technologies. Last week the Redmond- based corporation integrated cell tower triangulation into its Live Search Mobile application. It would not be surprising to see Microsoft interested in Wi-Fi positioning too.

If we look at the market as a whole, wireless operators are slowly but surely giving away their primacy over their customer’s location data, now offered as a web service by a wide variety of providers. The range of these providers is growing but there is however a strong barrier of entry: the gathering of Cell-ID and Wi-Fi data on a worldwide scale.

« Previous | 1 | 2


Tuesday 20th January 2009
Ludovic Privat

Visitors

C-aIS Poster

C-aIS Poster